Pope Francis will be visiting Washington D.C. next Thursday, September 24, to give a speech to a Joint Session of Congress. My office has standing-room tickets for spectators to watch the address on jumbotrons on the West Lawn of the Capitol. After his speech, the Pope is expected to make an appearance on the Speaker’s Balcony, which looks out to the West Lawn. If you’re a constituent of my district and would like a ticket for the Pope’s appearance, please contact my D.C. office at (202) 225-2523. Tickets are limited and will be given out on a first come, first served basis.
Friday, September 18, 2015
Tickets available for Pope Francis appearance in DC
Pope Francis will be visiting Washington D.C. next Thursday, September 24, to give a speech to a Joint Session of Congress. My office has standing-room tickets for spectators to watch the address on jumbotrons on the West Lawn of the Capitol. After his speech, the Pope is expected to make an appearance on the Speaker’s Balcony, which looks out to the West Lawn. If you’re a constituent of my district and would like a ticket for the Pope’s appearance, please contact my D.C. office at (202) 225-2523. Tickets are limited and will be given out on a first come, first served basis.
Friday, September 4, 2015
Nunes office seeking interns
Fall
and spring internships are available in my Washington, D.C. and Visalia
offices. If you know someone who is interested in politics and public affairs,
wants to gain professional experience, and can excel in a fast-paced
environment, please pass along this message.
Interns
provide critical staff support and are often called on to work at public
events, conduct research, and help with special projects. The application
process is now open for both part-time and full-time applicants.
All
interns must have a high school diploma. Additionally, they must be enrolled in
or have recently graduated from an accredited college or university.
Applications can be downloaded from my website here.
For
answers to questions about my intern program, please call (559) 733-3861 or
(202) 225-2523.
Friday, August 28, 2015
#HetchHetchyHypocrites
A recent UC Davis study
projected the costs of the California water crisis this year. The researchers
found:
·
The net water shortage will be 2.5 million
acre-feet in 2015.
·
In response, farmers will fallow 542,000 acres
of land.
·
The crisis will cost the California economy
$2.74 billion this year, with the loss of 21,000 jobs.
The study finds
that California agriculture is faring better than many predicted. Some areas are suffering much more than others,
however. As the researchers previously noted,
“The impacts are concentrated mostly
in the San Joaquin Valley.”
For decades, elites in the Bay Area, which is a primary support base for many radical environmental groups, have successfully fought to divert huge amounts of Delta water from Central Valley families and communities to environmental causes. Meanwhile, the Bay Area’s own water supply is not subject to these diversions. San Francisco and other coastal communities enjoy an uninterrupted water supply piped in across the state from the Hetch Hetchy reservoir in Yosemite National Park. As Valley farmers fallow their dried up land, take a look at Hetch Hetchy – these photos were sent to my office by a Valley farmer who visited Yosemite last month:
It’s quite amazing how much water the Bay Area has kept for itself by exempting Hetch Hetchy from the punishing water regulations it has foisted on the Central Valley.
Let’s see if we can draw the Bay Area’s attention. If you
have pictures of Hetch Hetchy brimming with
water, please post them on your social media accounts with the hashtag
#HetchHetchyHypocrites.
Monday, August 17, 2015
Global warming overload
Since
its inception, the Obama administration has engaged in an all-out push to adopt
ever-stricter global warming regulations. Recall that Barack Obama was the only
presidential candidate – at least as far as I can remember – who took office
vowing to bankrupt
any company in an entire American industry that refuses to adhere to his
environmental agenda.
When President Obama’s attempt to impose
a carbon-trading scheme on the U.S. economy proved too
extreme even for a Democrat-controlled Congress to approve, the President
remarked that there’s more than one way to skin a cat. And since then, his
administration has passed crushing global warming regulations through
unilateral, administrative means. Despite the extensive list of taxpayer
subsidized green energy disasters – Solyndra, Fisker
Automotive, Beacon Power, A123 Systems Inc, EnerDel, to name a few – the
administration’s green policies march ever forward.
The
latest salvo is the president’s new “climate
action plan,” which mandates drastic reductions in carbon emissions from
power plants over the next few decades. The plan provoked a thoughtful Wall
Street Journal article
discussing the administration’s claim that these regulations will not result in
higher electricity prices that hurt the poor. That argument, the Journal
noted, is refuted by the plan itself, which demands that states launch
redistribution schemes to lessen the regulations’ impact on poor communities.
The
climate plan also led to observations
that despite the massive harm it will do to the economy, it will barely have
any effect at all on global warming – the problem it ostensibly aims to
address. However, the plan did have at least one immediate effect – an array of
business groups and states is vowing to sue
the government to stop these punitive regulations.
To
drum up support for these economically destructive policies, global warmists
resort to apocalyptic rhetoric, with President Obama claiming there is “no
greater threat to our planet.” As Chairman of the House Permanent Select
Committee on Intelligence, I
have to, respectfully, disagree.
Separately,
the Nunes Digest is updated here.
Friday, August 7, 2015
Friday, July 24, 2015
Greece: A cautionary tale
As Greece prepares to enter another round of seemingly endless negotiations with its creditors, it’s a good time to consider how the cradle of Western civilization became a bankrupt and broken nation.
While its adoption of the Euro has clearly damaged Greece’s ability to respond to its various crises, the core problem is that the Greek government ran up hidden, unsustainable debts. It turned to international creditors for a series of bailouts and had to adopt austerity measures such as higher taxes and spending cuts. The fiscal crisis spiraled into an economic, social, and political crisis punctuated by the following:
· A disastrous rise in long-term unemployment.
· The closure of banks, causing major economic disruptions.
· The rise in support for a far-right extremist party, and the assumption of power by a far-left Marxist party.
· The emigration of 3 percent of the population, mostly young people, between 2010 and 2013.
How
did Greece reach this point? A 2010 exposé
in Vanity Fair describes how the government was shoveling money into the
public sector, which had doubled in size over the previous decade. Taxes from
private sector workers, who earned on average just one-third the salary of public employees, could not cover the bill, especially since tax evasion and
bribery had become a kind of national sport. The writer explains the damaging
moral effect this collectivist system had on the Greek people:
“No success of any kind is regarded without suspicion.
Everyone is pretty sure everyone is cheating on his taxes, or bribing
politicians, or taking bribes, or lying about the value of his real estate. And
this total absence of faith in one another is self-reinforcing. The epidemic of
lying and cheating and stealing makes any sort of civic life impossible. . . .
The structure of the Greek economy is collectivist, but the country, in spirit,
is the opposite of a collective. Its real structure is every man for himself.”
At a time when the U.S. national debt is approaching $19 trillion, and when the country continues to accumulate tens of trillions more in unfunded liabilities on entitlement programs, Greece offers a cautionary tale showing that government over-spending is not generous or charitable – it’s destructive and it’s selfish, since it imperils a nation’s future generations. Balancing the budget is not just the first step in correcting our own perilous fiscal situation, it is a moral imperative.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)








